From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buckeye v. Quattrocchi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 2007
36 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-05230.

January 16, 2007.

In an action to recover on a promissory note, the plaintiff peals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (McMahon, J.), dated May 8, 2006, which, sua sponte, removed the action to the Civil Court, Richmond County, pursuant CPLR 325 (d).

Vlock Associates, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Steven Giordano of counsel), for appellant.

Before: Crane, J.P., Mastro, Santucci and Lifson, JJ.


Ordered that on the Court's own motion, the notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to peal is granted ( see CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, for a determination on the merits of the plaintiff's motion, inter alia, hold the defendant in contempt of court, and the Clerk of the Civil Court, Richmond County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, all papers filed in this action and certified copies of all minutes and entries ( see CPLR 511 [d]); and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

The plaintiff obtained a money judgment in the Supreme Court, Richmond County, which was in its favor and against the defendant in the principal sum of $18,145.52. The plaintiff sought to enforce the judgment by serving a judicial subpoena and a restraining notice in the Supreme Court. When the defendant failed to comply with the subpoena, the plaintiff moved in the Supreme Court to hold the defendant in contempt of court and to compel the defendant to comply with the subpoena. Without deciding the plaintiff's motion, the Supreme Court, sua sponte, removed the action to the Civil Court pursuant to CPLR 325 (d).

A motion to hold a party in contempt of court "with respect to an enforcement procedure" may only be brought in a court in which a special proceeding to enforce a money judgment may be commenced ( see CPLR 5210; Matter of Lupoli, 275 AD2d 44, 50; Cornell Fed. Credit Union v Thorpe, 199 AD2d 936). If a judgment sought to be enforced was entered in the Supreme Court, then a special proceeding to enforce that judgment may be commenced only in the Supreme Court or the County Court ( see CPLR 5221 [a] [4]; [b]; Matter of Lupoli, supra at 50; Langston v Reisch, 225 AD2d 1098). Here, the plaintiff properly brought the contempt motion in the Supreme Court, since the judgment it was seeking to enforce was entered in the Supreme Court. Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in, sua sponte, removing the action to the Civil Court pursuant to CPLR 325 (d).


Summaries of

Buckeye v. Quattrocchi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 2007
36 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Buckeye v. Quattrocchi

Case Details

Full title:BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO., LLC, LTD., Appellant, v. JOHN M. QUATTROCCHI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 16, 2007

Citations

36 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 252
828 N.Y.S.2d 217

Citing Cases

RH 528 W. 159 St. v. Timofeeva

Petitioner argues that Buckeye Retirement Co. LLC, Ltd. v. Quattrocchi, 36 A.D.3d 641 (2nd Dept. 2007)…

Morrison v. S. Union RD HC, LLC

It is further ORDERED that the defendants' motion insofar as it seeks to withdraw appeal No. 1 is granted,…