From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BUCKEL v. SUSS

New York Superior Court — General Term
Dec 1, 1892
2 Misc. 571 (N.Y. Misc. 1892)

Opinion

December, 1892.

Charles Steckler, for plaintiff (appellant).

Guggenheimer Untermeyer ( Samuel Untermeyer, of counsel), for defendant (respondent).


For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the court below, the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed, with costs.

Judgment and order affirmed.


Summaries of

BUCKEL v. SUSS

New York Superior Court — General Term
Dec 1, 1892
2 Misc. 571 (N.Y. Misc. 1892)
Case details for

BUCKEL v. SUSS

Case Details

Full title:BUCKEL v . SUSS

Court:New York Superior Court — General Term

Date published: Dec 1, 1892

Citations

2 Misc. 571 (N.Y. Misc. 1892)

Citing Cases

Hendrick v. Biggar

Such is not the law. Counsel have placed great reliance upon Buckel v. Suss, 18 N.Y.S. 719. It does not…