From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buck v. Scale Models, Arts Technologies, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Mar 14, 2006
Case No. 05-cv-352-PB (D.N.H. Mar. 14, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 05-cv-352-PB.

March 14, 2006


ORDER


The complaint was properly served in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and New Hampshire law. Defendant does not assert that it failed to receive timely notice of the action. The court plainly has specific personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Thus, defendant's venue challenge is governed by 28 U.S.C. 2404(a). When I evaluate the defendant's request to change venue using the criteria outlined in Coady v. Ashcraft Gerel, 223 F.3d 1, 11 (1st Cir. 2001), it is apparent that the case should remain in this district. The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 6) is denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Buck v. Scale Models, Arts Technologies, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Mar 14, 2006
Case No. 05-cv-352-PB (D.N.H. Mar. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Buck v. Scale Models, Arts Technologies, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:John Buck v. Scale Models, Arts and Technologies, Inc., et al

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Mar 14, 2006

Citations

Case No. 05-cv-352-PB (D.N.H. Mar. 14, 2006)