From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buchner v. Baker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 11, 1916
164 P. 659 (Okla. 1916)

Opinion

No. 7397

Opinion Filed July 11, 1916. Rehearing Denied September 19, 1916. Further Rehearing Denied May 15, 1917.

Limitation of Actions — Pleading — Statute — Necessity.

Where the defendant answers by a general denial and does not demur at any stage of the proceedings, the statute of limitations is not available to him as a defense.

(Syllabus by Burford, C.)

Error from District Court, Hughes County; John Caruthers, Judge.

Action by F.L. Baker against Al Buchner to recover for breach of covenants of a warranty deed. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Mann Diamond, for plaintiff in error.

J.L. Skinner, for defendant in error.


This suit was instituted by F.L. Baker to recover damages from Al Buchner arising from the breach of the covenants of a warranty deed. The defendant demurred to the original petition. The plaintiff then filed an amended petition. Defendant did not demur to the amended petition, but filed an answer which was a general denial. The record does not show that there was any objection or demurrer made at the trial. The plaintiff introduced his evidence, and the defendant rested without introducing any evidence. The court gave judgment for the plaintiff.

The sole assignment of error is that the court erred in rendering judgment for the plaintiff for the reason that the petition shows on face that the alleged cause of action was barred by the statute of limitation. This defense is not available to the defendant. The statute of limitation is a personal plea, and, unless raised by demurrer or proper objection where shown on the face of the proceedings, it must be pleaded or the party will be deemed to have waived it. Blumle v. Kramer, 14 Okla. 366, 79 P. 215; St. L. F. R. Co. v. Bloom, 39 Okla. 78, 134 P. 432.

The authorities cited by plaintiff in error to the effect that the question of the statute of limitations may be raised by demurrer, where sufficient facts to show that the action is barred appear upon the face of the petition, are not applicable here, for the very sufficient reason that counsel did not demur to the amended petition.

The cause is affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Buchner v. Baker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 11, 1916
164 P. 659 (Okla. 1916)
Case details for

Buchner v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:BUCHNER v. BAKER

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 11, 1916

Citations

164 P. 659 (Okla. 1916)
65 Okla. 130

Citing Cases

Oklahoma City v. Local Federal Sav. Loan Ass'n

The defense of limitation was waived when not pleaded, and it cannot be raised for the first time by…

DEVONIAN OIL CORPORATION RATION v. HURT

No objection was made to the evidence relating to damage sustained more than two years prior to the filing of…