From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buchert v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Feb 4, 2010
Case No. 1:06cv485 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 4, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 1:06cv485.

February 4, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on January 11, 2010 (Doc. 25).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 21) is GRANTED consistent with the opinion of the Magistrate and Counsel be awarded $10,223.90 in fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Buchert v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Feb 4, 2010
Case No. 1:06cv485 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Buchert v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Sherry Buchert, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Feb 4, 2010

Citations

Case No. 1:06cv485 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 4, 2010)