From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buchanan v. Neighbors Van Lines

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
Case No. CV10-6206-PSG(RCx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV10-6206-PSG(RCx)

11-22-2011

RUSSELL BUCHANAN, Plaintiff, v. NEIGHBORS VAN LINES, a Florida business of unknown form; A GOLDEN HAND MOVING, a Colorado business of unknown form; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.

GREGG S. GARFINKEL (156632) CRAIG S. WEINSTEIN (265488) NEMECEK & COLE A Professional Corporation Attorneys for Plaintiff RUSSELL BUCHANAN


GREGG S. GARFINKEL (156632)

CRAIG S. WEINSTEIN (265488)

NEMECEK & COLE

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Plaintiff

RUSSELL BUCHANAN

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING

NEIGHBORS VAN LINES

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEY'S OF RECORD:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action against NEIGHBORS VAN LINES is dismissed, with prejudice.

Judge P hilip S. Gutierrez

Of the United States District Court

For the Central District of California

PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action: my business address is 15260 Ventura Blvd., Suite 920, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403.

On November 22, 2011. I served the document described as [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING NEIGHBORS VAN LINES upon the interested parties in this action in sealed envelopes addressed as follows:

Jeffrey D. Nadel, Esq.

Law Offices of Jeffrey D. Nadel

16000 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 908

Encino, CA 91436

Lottie Cohen. Esq.

Law Office of Lottie Cohen, APC

3637 Motor Avenue, Suite 360

Los Angeles, CA 90034-4883

310/204-0099

310/204-0095 (fax)

lottie.cohen@sbcglobal.net

Marcus C. Aguirre, Esq.

627 N. Sweetzer Avenue

Unit B

Los Angeles, CA 90048

x (By Mail) I am readily familiar with the firm s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Sherman Oaks, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after day of deposit for mailing contained in affidavit.
_ (By Overnight Delivery) I deposited this document in the box or other
facility located at 15260 Ventura Blvd., Suite 920, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 regularly maintained by Federal Express, in an envelope designated by Federal Express with delivery fees paid or provided for, addressed to the persons on whom it is to be served, for guaranteed next day delivery.
_ (By Electronic Mail) I caused the foregoing document to be served by electronically transmitting the document listed above to the e-mail address(es) of the person(s) set forth above from the e-mail address mshapiro@nemecek-cole com. To my knowledge, the transmission was reported as complete and without error. See, California Rules of Court, Rule 2060.
_ (By Facsimile Transmission) I served the foregoing document by facsimile transmission to each of the interested parties at the facsimile machine telecopy number shown below.
Executed on November 22, 2011 at Sherman Oaks, California.
X (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made.

MICHELLE SHAPIRO ____


Summaries of

Buchanan v. Neighbors Van Lines

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
Case No. CV10-6206-PSG(RCx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Buchanan v. Neighbors Van Lines

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL BUCHANAN, Plaintiff, v. NEIGHBORS VAN LINES, a Florida business of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV10-6206-PSG(RCx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)