From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BUCHANAN v. LOVING ET AL

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 3, 1912
128 P. 499 (Okla. 1912)

Opinion

No. 4409

Opinion Filed December 3, 1912.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Petition in Error — Case-Made — Filing. Syllabus same as Rolater v. Strain, 31 Okla. 58, 119 P. 992.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from District Court, Jackson County; Frank Matthews, Judge.

Action between W. H. Buchanan and W. J. Loving and J. H. Loving. From the judgment, Buchanan brings error. Dismissed.

Tisinger, Clay, Robinson Hamilton, for plaintiff in error.

E. E. Gore, for defendants in error.


This cause comes on to be heard upon a motion by the defendants in error to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that the case-made and petition in error were not filed in the Supreme Court within six months after the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial in the district court was rendered. The record shows that the order overruling the motion for a new trial was entered on the 30th day of September, 1911, and that the case-made was filed in the Supreme Court on the 30th day of September, 1912. As the Session Laws of 1911, c. 18, p. 35, requiring appeals to be taken in six months, became effective on the 14th day of June, 1911, the petition in error and case-made should have been filed within six months after the date of the rendition of judgment overruling the motion for new trial. Rolater v. Strain, 31 Okla. 58, 119 P. 992.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

BUCHANAN v. LOVING ET AL

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 3, 1912
128 P. 499 (Okla. 1912)
Case details for

BUCHANAN v. LOVING ET AL

Case Details

Full title:BUCHANAN v. LOVING et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 3, 1912

Citations

128 P. 499 (Okla. 1912)
128 P. 499

Citing Cases

Bell v. Bearman

Laws 1910-11, p. 35), limiting the time within which appeals can be taken to six months, is not retroactive…