From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryson v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio
Jul 1, 2021
1:20-cv-01137 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 1, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01137

07-01-2021

Michael Clark Bryson, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

John R. Adams Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

The Magistrate Judge for this matter submitted a Report and Recommendation recommending that this Court vacate and remand the Commissioner's decision for further proceedings. (R. & R., ECF No. 18.)

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), if the parties wish to object to the proposed findings and recommendation, they must do so by filing specific written objections within the fourteen (14) days following service of the Report and Recommendation. Neither party submitted objections. Further review by this Court at this time would be a duplicative and inefficient use of this Court's resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted. (R. & R., ECF No. 18.) The decision of the Commissioner is hereby VACATED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bryson v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio
Jul 1, 2021
1:20-cv-01137 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Bryson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:Michael Clark Bryson, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio

Date published: Jul 1, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-01137 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 1, 2021)

Citing Cases

Weir v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

In Meyer v. Commissioner, the court specifically found “evidence in the record showing that Meyer had a…

Michael H. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

The Court finds no basis to conclude that the ALJ was required to accept Mr. Heckman's report. See Johnson v.…