Summary
dismissing plaintiff's breach of contract claim after finding that plaintiff's “Bill of Exchange” allegedly payable by the Treasury was a “worthless piece of paper” that could not satisfy her mortgage payment
Summary of this case from Yates v. The Money Source, Inc.Opinion
No. 08-1148.
Submitted: June 19, 2008.
Decided: June 23, 2008.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:07-cv-00015-nkm).
Maureen Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Robertson, Long Neyhart, P.C., Blacksburg, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Maureen Bryant appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil action for breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and conspiracy regarding foreclosure proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryant v. Washington Mutual Bank, 524 F.Supp.2d 753 (W.D.Va. 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.