considering fact that, "at some point in the past, respondent’s then-wife had accused him of violence" in concluding petitioner’s "alarm and fear were reasonable"
Summary of this case from M. D. O. v. DeSantisS51067.
November 12, 2004.
(A118386) ( 190 Or App 253).
Petitions for review dismissed. It is ordered that appellant's petition for review previously allowed May 18, 2004 ( 337 Or 34) is dismissed as improvidently allowed.
considering fact that, "at some point in the past, respondent’s then-wife had accused him of violence" in concluding petitioner’s "alarm and fear were reasonable"
Summary of this case from M. D. O. v. DeSantisdeclining to address a respondent's claim that the court erred by not allowing him to cross-examine the petitioner under similar circumstances
Summary of this case from J. D. v. S. K.Full title:BRYANT v. WALKER
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Nov 12, 2004
"(7) `Repeated' means two or more times." In Bryant v. Walker, 190 Or App 253, 256, 78 P3d 148 (2003), rev…
S.A.B. v. RoachIn addition to conduct by the respondent that amounts to at least two unwanted “contacts,” a petitioner must…