From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryant v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Oct 26, 2012
Case No. C12-5040-RSM (W.D. Wash. Oct. 26, 2012)

Summary

finding mental-health symptoms exacerbated by "situational stressors" "not clear and convincing reason to discount plaintiff's credibility"

Summary of this case from Wilson v. Berryhill

Opinion

Case No. C12-5040-RSM

10-26-2012

TAMMIE S. BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER REVERSING AND

REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

The Court, after careful consideration of the plaintiff's complaint, the parties' briefs, all papers and exhibits filed in support and opposition thereto, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, and the balance of the record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) The final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

(3) The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to Judge Donohue.

___________

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bryant v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Oct 26, 2012
Case No. C12-5040-RSM (W.D. Wash. Oct. 26, 2012)

finding mental-health symptoms exacerbated by "situational stressors" "not clear and convincing reason to discount plaintiff's credibility"

Summary of this case from Wilson v. Berryhill

finding mental-health symptoms exacerbated by "situational stressors" "not clear and convincing reason to discount plaintiff's credibility"

Summary of this case from Rys v. Berryhill

concluding Plaintiff's stressors appeared to have a constant presence affecting ability to work on a continuing basis, rather than temporary exacerbation

Summary of this case from Michelle B. v. Saul

concluding Plaintiff's stressors appeared to have a constant presence affecting ability to work on a continuing basis, rather than temporary exacerbation

Summary of this case from Jeffrey R. v. Saul

concluding Plaintiff's stressors appeared to have a constant presence affecting ability to work on a continuing basis, rather than temporary exacerbation

Summary of this case from Cody C. v. Saul

concluding Plaintiff's stressors appeared to have a constant presence affecting ability to work on a continuing basis, rather than temporary exacerbation

Summary of this case from Amy B. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Bryant v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:TAMMIE S. BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Date published: Oct 26, 2012

Citations

Case No. C12-5040-RSM (W.D. Wash. Oct. 26, 2012)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Berryhill

See Chesler v. Colvin, 649 F. App'x 631, 632 (9th Cir. 2016) (symptom testimony properly rejected in part…

Shaun S. v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin.

Additionally, the court disagrees with the ALJ's finding that "situational stressors" fully explains the…