From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryant v. Apotex, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-01377 LJO JLT (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-01377 LJO JLT

01-18-2013

KEVIN D. BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. APOTEX, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE

APPLICATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING

SCHEDULE


(Doc. 46)

On January 17, 2013, Defendants filed an ex parte application to modify the briefing schedule regarding their motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court has considered the application and finds good cause to modify the briefing schedule. Accordingly, Defendants shall file their joint reply brief by no later than January 25, 2013. Further, in the interest of justice and judicial economy, the Court will instruct the Clerk of Court to file and docket Plaintiff's opposition papers. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Plaintiff served Defendants with his opposition but failed to file the document with the Court. Defendants have, however, attached a true copy of Plaintiff's opposition papers to their ex parte application. (Doc. 46-2, Exs. B & C.)

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bryant v. Apotex, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-01377 LJO JLT (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Bryant v. Apotex, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN D. BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. APOTEX, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-01377 LJO JLT (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2013)