From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BRYANT v. ADP INC

United States District Court, C.D. California, Riverside Division
Nov 16, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. ED CV 09-01387 JRG (C.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. ED CV 09-01387 JRG.

November 16, 2010


ORDER


The court has been advised by counsel of the pending settlement of this action. The court, therefore, finds it unnecessary to conduct further proceedings or to keep this case on the active docket. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows:

1. That the remaining requirements of the Scheduling Order be continued.

2. That the Clerk retire this action from the active docket. The parties may submit an agreed order of dismissal within thirty days of the entry of this Order. Otherwise, dismissal will be without prejudice.

The court will reinstate this case to the active docket if one of the parties shows good cause for such reinstatement within thirty days of the entry of this Order.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: November 16, 2010


Summaries of

BRYANT v. ADP INC

United States District Court, C.D. California, Riverside Division
Nov 16, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. ED CV 09-01387 JRG (C.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2010)
Case details for

BRYANT v. ADP INC

Case Details

Full title:MARK BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. ADP INC., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, C.D. California, Riverside Division

Date published: Nov 16, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. ED CV 09-01387 JRG (C.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2010)