From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruton v. Mills

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 29, 2012
No. :08-0952 (M.D. Tenn. May. 29, 2012)

Opinion

No. :08-0952

05-29-2012

MELL T. BRUTON Petitioner, v. TOMMY MILLS, WARDEN, et al. Respondents.


JUDGE HAYNES


ORDER

Petitioner has filed a Notice of Appeal (Docket Entry No.87). He has yet, however, to either pay the fee required for the filing of his appeal or submit an application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, Petitioner is GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order on the docket in which to submit to the Clerk of this Court either the full appellate filing fee of four hundred fifty five dollars ($455) or an application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.

It is so ORDERED.

_________________

WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bruton v. Mills

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
May 29, 2012
No. :08-0952 (M.D. Tenn. May. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Bruton v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:MELL T. BRUTON Petitioner, v. TOMMY MILLS, WARDEN, et al. Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: May 29, 2012

Citations

No. :08-0952 (M.D. Tenn. May. 29, 2012)