Opinion
Argued June 14, 1892
Decided October 11, 1892
Robert Sewell for appellant.
D.J. Dean for respondent.
Per Curiam opinion for reversal.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Brusie v. Peck Brothers Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 11, 1892
135 N.Y. 622 (N.Y. 1892)
Summaries of
Brusie v. Peck Brothers Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 11, 1892
135 N.Y. 622 (N.Y. 1892)
Case details for
Brusie v. Peck Brothers Company
Case Details
Full title:RUSSELL BRUSIE, Respondent, v . PECK BROTHERS COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 11, 1892
Citations
135 N.Y. 622 (N.Y. 1892)
48 N.Y. St. Rptr. 439
32 N.E. 76
Citing Cases
Fageol Tate v. Baird-Bailhache Co.
All the cases which we have found on the subject support the same rule. ( Perfection Socket Co. v. American…
Huot v. Dworman( Munro's Estate, 15 Abb. Prac. 363, 366.) The clerk is without authority to enter a judgment which the court…