From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. of N.Y. v. Willbee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

May, 1930.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County.

Present — Dowling, P.J., Merrell, Martin, O'Malley and Sherman, JJ. Order modified by granting motion to the extent of striking out the first alleged defense, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, with leave to the defendant to serve an amended answer within twenty days from service of order upon payment of said costs.


The first separate defense is insufficient to establish a conditional delivery. Its effect is to show merely a condition subsequent and thus a variation of the terms of the written chattel mortgage sought to be foreclosed. The second defense is not subject to this criticism as it fairly pleads a condition precedent. It follows that the order appealed from should be modified by granting the motion to the extent of striking out the first alleged defense, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, with leave to the defendant to serve an amended answer, if it be so advised, within twenty days from service of the order to be entered hereon upon payment of said costs.


Summaries of

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. of N.Y. v. Willbee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. of N.Y. v. Willbee

Case Details

Full title:THE BRUNSWICK-BALKE-COLLENDER COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. WILLBEE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1930

Citations

229 App. Div. 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)