From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brunskill v. Santa Cruz Cnty. Jail Admin.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 31, 2024
23-cv-04915-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-04915-WHO (PR)

01-31-2024

DYLAN RICHEY BRUNSKILL, Plaintiff, v. SANTA CRUZ COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Brunskill has not complied with the Hon. Sallie Kim's instructions to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 10.) Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with a court order, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Brunkskill may move to reopen. Any such motion must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page; and (ii) contain an amended complaint that complies with the instructions in Judge Kim's order dismissing the complaint with leave to amend.

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brunskill v. Santa Cruz Cnty. Jail Admin.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 31, 2024
23-cv-04915-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Brunskill v. Santa Cruz Cnty. Jail Admin.

Case Details

Full title:DYLAN RICHEY BRUNSKILL, Plaintiff, v. SANTA CRUZ COUNTY JAIL…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 31, 2024

Citations

23-cv-04915-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)