From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brunsen v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Sep 12, 2012
381 P.3d 597 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 60092.

09-12-2012

Thomas O. BRUNSEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Thomas O. Brunsen Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


Thomas O. Brunsen

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER OF REVERSAL AND REMAND

This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a post-conviction petition. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Donald M. Mosley, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911(1975).

Appellant's petition was filed on August 17, 2011, more than one year after entry of the judgment of conviction on August 10, 2010. Thus, the district court denied the petition as procedurally barred based on NRS 34.726(1). Our review of the record reveals that appellant's petition was stamped received by the clerk's office on August 9, 2011, within the one-year time limit for filing a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Id. Because the petition was timely submitted for filing, the district court erred in applying the procedural bar. The petition must be decided on the merits. Accordingly, we

It is not clear why there was an eight-day delay in officially filing the petition.


ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.


Summaries of

Brunsen v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Sep 12, 2012
381 P.3d 597 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Brunsen v. State

Case Details

Full title:Thomas O. BRUNSEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Sep 12, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 597 (Nev. 2012)