From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruno v. Frias

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 6, 2015
ED CV 14-1996-MWF (AS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2015)

Opinion

          Frederick John Bruno, Jr., Plaintiff, Pro se, Rancho Cucamonga, CA.

          For Facility Deputy J. Frias, individual, Defendant: James H Thebeau, LEAD ATTORNEY, San Bernardino County Counsel, San Bernardino, CA.


          Proceedings (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause Re. Lack of Prosecution

          Alka Sagar, United States Magistrate Judge.

         On September 30, 2014, Plaintiff Frederick John Bruno Jr., filed a complaint naming three defendants (Docket Entry No. 3). The Court's docket reflects that on December 8, 2014, the United States Marshall served a summons on defendant Deputy Sheriff J. Frias but was unable to serve defendants Francis and Johnson (Docket Entry Nos. 13-15). On December 16, 2014, Defendant Deputy Frias filed an Answer to the Complaint (Docket Entry No. 16). On June 24, 2015, mail addressed to Plaintiff at the West Valley Detention Center was returned with the notation that Plaintiff is no longer in custody (Docket Entry No. 18). On August 3, 2015, the Court issued an Order directing Plaintiff to provide the Court with his current address (Docket Entry No. 19). On August 14, 2015, the Court's August 3, 2015 Order was returned as undelivered mail (Docket Entry No. 20).

         As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has failed to serve two of the three defendants named in the complaint and failed to provide the Court with a current address. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than Friday, October 30, 2015, why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to obey a court order. This Order will be discharged upon the filing of a notice of change of address or by filing a declaration under penalty of perjury stating why Plaintiff is unable to do so.

         The Clerk is directed to attach a copy of the Court's Order requiring Plaintiff to provide the Court with his current address (Docket Entry No. 19) to this Order.

         If Plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this action, he may request a voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). A notice of dismissal form is attached for Plaintiff's convenience. Plaintiff is warned that a failure to timely respond to this Order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and obey court orders.


Summaries of

Bruno v. Frias

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 6, 2015
ED CV 14-1996-MWF (AS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Bruno v. Frias

Case Details

Full title:Frederick John Bruno Jr., v. Facility Deputy J. Frias, et. al,

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 6, 2015

Citations

ED CV 14-1996-MWF (AS) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2015)