From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruno v. BRD US, Inc.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
May 26, 2021
20-233 (La. Ct. App. May. 26, 2021)

Opinion

20-233

05-26-2021

VICTOR BRUNO v. BRD US, INC., ET AL.

Patrick Daniel Rachel Deckelmann Daniel & Associates, LLC 7941 Katy Freeway Suite 791 Houston, TX 77024 (713) 999-6666 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT: Victor Bruno Douglas Kent Williams Chris D. Billings Jordan L. Faircloth Breazeale, Sasche & Wilson P. O. Box 3197 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-3197 (225) 381-8032 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLEES: Courtesy Automotive Group, Inc. Courtesy Lincoln Sales Lafayette,LLC


Chris D. Billings
Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson
P. O. Box 3197
Baton Rouge LA 70821-3197 Douglas Kent Williams
Breazeale, Sasche & Wilson
P. O. Box 3197
Baton Rouge LA 70821-3197 Jordan L. Faircloth
Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson
P. O. Box 3197
Baton Rouge LA 70821-3197

Appealed from Lafayette Parish Case No. C-2015007

BEFORE JUDGES: Hon. Shannon J. Gremillion Hon. Van H. Kyzar Hon. Candyce G. Perret As counsel of record in the captioned case, you are hereby notified that the application for rehearing filed by Courtesy Automotive Group, Inc. and Courtesy Lincoln Sales Lafayette, LLC has this day been

GRANTED. (See opinion on rehearing also rendered this date) cc: Patrick Daniel, Counsel for the Appellant

Rachel Deckelmann, Counsel for the Appellant

Joseph George Glass, Counsel for the Appellee

Andrew David Weinstock, Counsel for the Appellee

Linda A. Hewlett, Counsel for the Appellee

Marc Damon Moroux, Counsel for the Appellee

Michael J. Remondet, Jr., Counsel for the Appellee

Scott F. Higgins, Counsel for the Appellee APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. C-2015007
HONORABLE MARILYN CARR CASTLE, DISTRICT JUDGE ON REHEARING VAN H. KYZAR JUDGE Court composed of Shannon J. Gremillion, Van H. Kyzar, and Candyce G. Perret, Judges.

AFFIRMED AS AMENDED ON REHEARING.

Patrick Daniel
Rachel Deckelmann
Daniel & Associates, LLC
7941 Katy Freeway Suite 791
Houston, TX 77024
(713) 999-6666
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT:

Victor Bruno Douglas Kent Williams
Chris D. Billings
Jordan L. Faircloth
Breazeale, Sasche & Wilson
P. O. Box 3197
Baton Rouge, LA 70821-3197
(225) 381-8032
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS/APPELLEES:

Courtesy Automotive Group, Inc.

Courtesy Lincoln Sales Lafayette,LLC KYZAR, Judge. ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

The application for rehearing filed by the Defendants-Appellees, Courtesy Automotive Group, Inc. and Courtesy Lincoln Sales Lafayette, Inc., (collectively "Courtesy") is granted without further argument for the singular purpose of effecting an amendment to our original opinion. Therein we reversed a decision of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants, Courtesy, remanding the case to the trial court for further proceedings. In the opinion we referred to Mr. Eric Simon as a former employee of Courtesy. Defendant argues that this statement is not supported by the record before the court in support of or in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. We agree that the language is in error in that the record reflects, through the affidavit of Courtesy employee Shirley Lebreton, who was an employee of Courtesy, that it was Mr. Simon's then wife Michelle Hargroder Simon who was the employee of Courtesy at the time the dealership was invoiced for the change of tires on the Can Am vehicle via G & H Tire. Thus, we amend our original opinion to so reflect. Any reference to Mr. Simon as an employee or former employee of Courtesy is thus amended to reflect that it was his former wife who was an employee of Courtesy. In all other respects, we affirm the opinion previously rendered by this court.

DECREE

Rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of reflecting that it was Mr. Eric Simon's now ex-wife, Michelle Hargroder Simon, who is the sister to the general manager for Courtesy, who was the actual employee of Courtesy at the time that the tires to the Can Am vehicle were replaced and charged to G & H tire through the dealership, Courtesy, rather than Mr. Simon himself.

The original opinion of this court, as amended herein, is reaffirmed in all other respects, the judgment of the trial court having been reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

AFFIRMED AS AMENDED ON REHEARING.


Summaries of

Bruno v. BRD US, Inc.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
May 26, 2021
20-233 (La. Ct. App. May. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Bruno v. BRD US, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR BRUNO v. BRD US, INC., ET AL.

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

Date published: May 26, 2021

Citations

20-233 (La. Ct. App. May. 26, 2021)