From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brundage v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 27, 1992
593 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-2465.

February 27, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Donald Moran, J.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Nada M. Carey, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Marilyn McFadden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


This appeal is taken from an order revoking appellant's probation. Appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to articulate the specific conditions of probation found to have been violated. As a prerequisite to revocation of probation, the trial court must state the specific terms and conditions of which the probationer has been found in violation. Dantler v. State, 584 So.2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Brewer v. State, 583 So.2d 814 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Knight v. State, 566 So.2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Accordingly, the order revoking appellant's probation is reversed, and the cause is remanded for entry of a written order specifying the terms and conditions relied upon by the trial court for revocation of probation.

SHIVERS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brundage v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 27, 1992
593 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Brundage v. State

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL JESSIE BRUNDAGE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 27, 1992

Citations

593 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Tessier v. State

As amended, the order of revocation of probation is affirmed. See Gore v. State, 616 So.2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA…

Rogers v. State

It is well-settled that, as a prerequisite to revocation of probation, the trial court must state the…