From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruce v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI HATTIESBURG DIVISION
Jan 3, 2012
CIVIL ACTION 2:11cv100-KS-MTP (S.D. Miss. Jan. 3, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 2:11cv100-KS-MTP

01-03-2012

ERIC DANA BRUCE v. BERKELY HALL


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered herein on January 5, 2012, after referral of hearing by this Court, no objections having been filed as to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court, having fully reviewed the same as well as the record in this matter, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the finding of this Court, and the Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with this Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED, this the 25th day of January, 2012.

Keith Starrett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bruce v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI HATTIESBURG DIVISION
Jan 3, 2012
CIVIL ACTION 2:11cv100-KS-MTP (S.D. Miss. Jan. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Bruce v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:ERIC DANA BRUCE v. BERKELY HALL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI HATTIESBURG DIVISION

Date published: Jan 3, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 2:11cv100-KS-MTP (S.D. Miss. Jan. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

Young v. Kirklin

"A motion for post-conviction relief does not toll the one-year limitations period applicable to filing for…

Spearman v. Fisher

But, "[a] motion for post-conviction relief does not toll the one-year limitations period applicable to…