From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broyles v. Northwest Portrait Finishers

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 29, 1961
229 Or. 427 (Or. 1961)

Opinion

Argued December 7, 1961

Affirmed December 29, 1961

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

PAUL R. HARRIS, Judge.

Earle P. Skow and Martin J. Howard, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were James Arthur Powers and Earle P. Skow, Portland.

No appearance for respondent.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.


An action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in an automobile accident. Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment. Defendant appeals.

With one exception the issues presented on this appeal were not raised in the trial court. Nor does the brief conform to Rule 19 of this court. The appeal is without merit. The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Broyles v. Northwest Portrait Finishers

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 29, 1961
229 Or. 427 (Or. 1961)
Case details for

Broyles v. Northwest Portrait Finishers

Case Details

Full title:BROYLES v. NORTHWEST PORTRAIT FINISHERS

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Dec 29, 1961

Citations

229 Or. 427 (Or. 1961)
367 P.2d 403

Citing Cases

Wells v. Washington County

A third assignment says the court erred in failing to strike a specification in the complaint which alleged…

Rohner v. Neville

The failure to raise the Torrens title question below produced a record on appeal which is devoid of useful…