From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brownlee v. Brogan

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel D
Feb 13, 2008
No. 07-08-0034-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-08-0034-CV

February 13, 2008.

Appealed from the 99th District Court of Lubbock County; No. 2007-539,760; Honorable William C. Sowder, Judge.

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.


ON MOTION TO DISMISS


Appellants Diane Brownlee and Brandon Brownlee filed a motion to dismiss their appeal. While their motion contained a certificate of service it did not contain a certificate of conference as required by Rule 10.1. Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a)(5). We notified appellants and appellees of this fact by letter of January 25, 2008, and there in explained that any appellee wishing to file a response should do so within ten days of the letter. Having held the motion for ten days with no response from an appellee we proceed to the merits of the motion.

As no decision of the Court has been delivered to date, we grant appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal. The appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). The parties have not presented an agreement for taxation of costs. Therefore costs are taxed against appellants. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).


Summaries of

Brownlee v. Brogan

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel D
Feb 13, 2008
No. 07-08-0034-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2008)
Case details for

Brownlee v. Brogan

Case Details

Full title:DIANE BROWNLEE AND BRANDON BROWNLEE, APPELLANT v. WALTER C. BROGAN, III…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel D

Date published: Feb 13, 2008

Citations

No. 07-08-0034-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2008)