From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION
Apr 19, 2016
Crim. No. 4:13-cr-01088-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 19, 2016)

Opinion

Crim. No. 4:13-cr-01088-RBH-1 C/A No. 4:16-cv-00805-RBH

04-19-2016

Brandon Orlando Brown, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's [ECF #51] motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Petitioner, Brandon Orlando Brown, who is represented by Assistant Federal Public Defender, Michael Meetze, was originally sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of 180 months imprisonment pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) ("ACCA"). Petitioner now seeks resentencing alleging he no longer has three predicate convictions as required by the Armed Career Criminal Act.

On April 5, 2016, the government filed a response conceding that Petitioner should be resentenced as his South Carolina convictions for second degree burglary no longer qualify as predicate offenses under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), in light of Johnson v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015) and the Fourth Circuit decision, United States v. McLeod, 808 F.3d 972 (4th Cir. 2015). On April 18, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Johnson, which held that the definition of prior "violent felony" in the residual clause of the ACCA was unconstitutionally vague under due process principles, announced a substantive rule that applied retroactively on collateral review. Welch v. United States, ___ S.Ct.___, 2016 WL 1551144 (2016).

Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, and in light of Respondent's position supporting Petitioner's motion to vacate, IT IS ORDERED that 1. Petitioner's [ECF# 51] motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is GRANTED. 2. All remaining provisions of Petitioner's criminal judgment shall remain unchanged pending further orders of this Court. 3. Petitioner shall remain in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons pending his resentencing hearing. 4. The U.S. Probation Office shall prepare a Supplemental Presentence Report in advance of Petitioner's resentencing hearing and file the same in the criminal case. 5. The Clerk of Court shall appoint counsel for the Petitioner for the purpose of the resentencing hearing. 6. The Clerk of Court shall coordinate the date of the resentencing with Chambers. 7. The Clerk's Office shall notify the Petitioner, U.S. Attorney, Defense counsel, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the U.S. Probation Office of the date of the resentencing hearing. 8. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to certify copies of this Order to the Petitioner, Defense counsel, U.S. Attorney, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the U.S. Probation Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED. April 19, 2016
Florence, South Carolina

s/ R. Bryan Harwell

R. Bryan Harwell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brown v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION
Apr 19, 2016
Crim. No. 4:13-cr-01088-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 19, 2016)
Case details for

Brown v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Brandon Orlando Brown, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 19, 2016

Citations

Crim. No. 4:13-cr-01088-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 19, 2016)