From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 21, 1966
368 F.2d 841 (5th Cir. 1966)

Opinion

No. 23810.

November 21, 1966.

H.M. Ray, U.S. Atty., E. Grady Jolly, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., for appellee.

Before JONES, WISDOM and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.


The appellant has appealed from the denial of a motion for the correction of sentence pursuant to Rule 35, Federal Rules Crim.Proc., 18 U.S.C.A. After waiver of counsel, appellant entered a plea of guilty to all three counts of an indictment. Each count carried a maximum penalty of five years. The district court imposed a general sentence of six years. The contention is that the sentence is illegal under Benson v. United States, 5th Cir. 1964, 332 F.2d 288. The sentence was imposed prior to the decision in the Benson case. The question is whether Benson should be given retrospective effect. It is our conclusion that retrospective effect is not required either by the Constitution of the United States or by anything said in the Benson opinion. See Tehan v. United States ex rel. Shott, 382 U.S. 406, 86 S.Ct. 459, 15 L. Ed.2d 453, 456-461 (1966). The order of the district court is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Brown v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 21, 1966
368 F.2d 841 (5th Cir. 1966)
Case details for

Brown v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Roland BROWN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Nov 21, 1966

Citations

368 F.2d 841 (5th Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

United States v. Maude

Since we find Straite inapposite here, see text infra at notes 127-128, we need not inquire whether in any…

United States ex rel. Mayfield v. Pate

At oral argument the question was asked and unanswered whether federal courts of appeals had considered the…