From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Mar 9, 2017
NUMBER 13-17-00109-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 9, 2017)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-17-00109-CR

03-09-2017

MARGOT JANET BROWN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


On appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Contreras, Benavides, and Longoria
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Contreras

Appellant, Margot Janet Brown, attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction for possession of cocaine. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Sentence in this matter was imposed on September 1, 2016. No motion for new trial was filed. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on February 16, 2017. On February 16, 2017, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected. Appellant was advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court's directive. Appellant's counsel has responded that appellant's notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. 26.3.

Appellant's notice of appeal was due to have been filed on or before October 3, 2016. See id. 26.2(a)(1). Appellant did not file her notice of appeal until February 16, 2017. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.

This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a) (West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

DORI CONTRERAS

Justice Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 9th day of March, 2017.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Mar 9, 2017
NUMBER 13-17-00109-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 9, 2017)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARGOT JANET BROWN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Mar 9, 2017

Citations

NUMBER 13-17-00109-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 9, 2017)

Citing Cases

Rojas v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

Hone v. Hanafin, 104 S.W.3d 884, 886 (Tex. 2003) (per curiam) (citing Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617…