From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Jul 18, 2012
No. 4D11-1633 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jul. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D11-1633

07-18-2012

OLIVER BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Oliver Brown, Milton, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant is cautioned against the filing of future motions, petitions or appeals in this court which raise the same sentencing challenges as presented here, in that some of the claims were raised and rejected in previous motions and appeals. Such future attempts will result in referral to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary sanctions which may include forfeiture of gain time, see § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2011), and issuance of an order to show cause why further sanctions barring pro se filings should not also be instituted under State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48-49 (Fla. 1999). POLEN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. 97-17 CF10A.

Oliver Brown, Milton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Jul 18, 2012
No. 4D11-1633 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jul. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:OLIVER BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 18, 2012

Citations

No. 4D11-1633 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jul. 18, 2012)