From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Feb 20, 2001
43 S.W.3d 390 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED76602

Filed: February 20, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, HONORABLE LUCY RAUCH

Kent Denzel; Assistant State Public Defender; 3402 Buttonwood; Columbia, MO 65201-3722, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon; Attorney General; Susan K. Glass; Assistant Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899; Jefferson City, MO 65201, attorney for respondent.

Before Hoff, C.J. and Crane, J. and Blackmar, S.J.

ORDER



Larry G. Brown (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error is without merit. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Feb 20, 2001
43 S.W.3d 390 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:LARRY G. BROWN, Movant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Feb 20, 2001

Citations

43 S.W.3d 390 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)