From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 28, 1994
647 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 94-2067.

December 28, 1994.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Thomas M. Carney, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Linda S. Katz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and GREEN, JJ.


ON CONFESSION OF ERROR


This is an appeal from the resentencing which followed our decision in Brown v. State, 617 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). Because the offenses in question were committed during the same criminal transaction, it was error to impose consecutive rather than concurrent habitual offender sentences. Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994). The cause is remanded for correction of the sentences accordingly. The defendant need not be present.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 28, 1994
647 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHAUN BROWN, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 28, 1994

Citations

647 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Windisch v. State

See Bell v. State, 679 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Golz v. State, 674 So.2d 856 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Rolle…

Suggs v. State

Further, a defendant need not be present for resentencing where habitual offender sentences are reversed,…