From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 19, 2006
929 So. 2d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2D03-4656.

May 19, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Richard A. Luce and Brandt C. Downey, III, Judges.

Antwan E. Brown, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


We affirm Antwan Brown's appeal of his judgment and sentence entered after he pleaded guilty. We do so without prejudice for him to file a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) when the mandate in this case has issued and jurisdiction has returned to the circuit court. Any motion should not be deemed successive based upon the circuit court's denial of Brown's pro se motion to correct illegal sentence. See Schrader v. State, 890 So.2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (holding that a circuit court did not have jurisdiction to rule on a defendant's rule 3.800(a) motion filed during the pendency of his direct appeal).

Affirmed.

DAVIS and CANADY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 19, 2006
929 So. 2d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:Antwan E. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 19, 2006

Citations

929 So. 2d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)