From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 17, 1993
623 So. 2d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-2102.

September 17, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; John H. Adams, Sr., Judge.

Anthony Lopez Brown, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Myra J. Fried, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Anthony Brown challenges the legality of his sentence, claiming that the trial court erred in computing his sentencing guidelines scoresheet because the court utilized a multiplier in assessing legal constraint points. See Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 1991). We conclude that this matter must be remanded to the trial court for a hearing because the instant record does not contain the pertinent documents concerning the sentence which was imposed following an earlier reversal by this court. Brown v. State, 581 So.2d 242 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

VACATED; REMANDED for a hearing.

HARRIS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 17, 1993
623 So. 2d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BROWN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 17, 1993

Citations

623 So. 2d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)