From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Singh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 4, 1995
222 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 4, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the plaintiff Derek Brown to dismiss the defendants' counterclaims for contribution against him is granted.

The plaintiffs were injured in a three-car accident. One of the vehicles involved in the accident was operated by Majeet Singh and owned by Torch Transportation Corporation, and another vehicle involved in the accident was operated by Mohammad Iqbal and owned by Whispers Taxi, Inc. The plaintiff Derek Brown was operating the vehicle in which the plaintiff Michelle Brown was a passenger. The plaintiffs commenced this action against Singh, Torch Transportation Corporation, Iqbal, and Whispers Taxi, Inc. Thereafter, the plaintiff Michelle Brown issued a general release to the plaintiff Derek Brown in return for $8,500.

The release given by the plaintiff Michelle Brown to the plaintiff Derek Brown relieves Derek Brown "from liability to any other person for contribution" (General Obligations Law § 15-108 [b]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in denying Derek Brown's motion to dismiss the defendants' counterclaims for contribution against him (see, Matter of Torres v State of New York, 67 A.D.2d 814). Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. Singh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 4, 1995
222 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Brown v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:DEREK BROWN, Appellant, and MICHELLE BROWN, Respondent, v. MAJEET SINGH et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 4, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
634 N.Y.S.2d 520

Citing Cases

U.S. Fire Ins. Co. v. Raia

Here, U.S. Fire, upon settling with Raia, Rondos and Raia & Rondos, P.C., executed a release in favor of…

U.S. Fire Ins. Co. v. Raia

Here, U.S. Fire, upon settling with Raia, Rondos, and the R & R firm, executed a release in favor of Raia,…