From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 13, 2007
38 A.D.3d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-01535.

March 13, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, the Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated July 25, 2005, which modified a determination of a Hearing Officer, dated May 9, 2005, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules and imposing penalties.

Carnell Brown, Moravia, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Michelle Aronowitz and Carol Fischer of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Skelos, Covello and Balkin, JJ.


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, the positive test results for cannabinoids, and the hearing testimony that the petitioner's medication did not cause a false positive result, constituted substantial evidence of guilt ( see Matter of Rincon v Selsky, 28 AD3d 565, 566; Matter of Burse v Goord, 274 AD2d 678, 679; Matter of McBride v Selsky, 257 AD2d 930).

The petitioner's remaining contentions that he was denied access to certain documentary evidence and that the hearing was improperly extended are without merit.


Summaries of

Brown v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 13, 2007
38 A.D.3d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Brown v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CARNELL BROWN, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 13, 2007

Citations

38 A.D.3d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 2115
831 N.Y.S.2d 522

Citing Cases

Matter of Kendrick v. New York State Dep.

DECISION JUDGMENT Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, the testimony adduced at…

In the Matter of Jaythan Kendrick v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr. Serv.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, the testimony adduced at the Tier III…