From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Schrum

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jun 25, 2008
Case No. C08-5326RBL/JKA (W.D. Wash. Jun. 25, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. C08-5326RBL/JKA.

June 25, 2008


NOTED FOR: July 25, 2008

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This proposed action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and local Rules MJR 3 and 4. Plaintiff filed an incomplete motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk's letter sent a deficiency letter to plaintiff informing him of the defects. Plaintiff then completed his application (Dkt. # 2 and 3).

His certified prison account shows a spendable balance of one thousand five hundred and fifteen dollars and forty-four cents ($1515.44). Further, plaintiff receives three hundred dollars a month in retirement from the United States Air force. The court concludes plaintiff has the ability to pay the three hundred and fifty-dollar filing fee in this case.

The district court may permit indigent litigants to proceed in forma pauperis upon completion of a proper affidavit of indigence. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). However, the court has broad discretion in denying an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Weller v. Dickson, 314 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 845 (1963). Plaintiff has shown the ability to pay the full filing fee.

Based on the above, the Court should deny plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has not shown that is unable to pay the full filing fee to proceed with his lawsuit. The court should direct Mr. Brown to pay the filing fee within 30 days of the court's order and if he fails to pay the filing fee the clerk should be directed to dismiss this matter.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have ten (10) days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed.R.Civ.P. 6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for purposes of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Accommodating the time limit imposed by Rule 72(b), the clerk is directed to set the matter for consideration on July 25, 2008, as noted in the caption.


Summaries of

Brown v. Schrum

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jun 25, 2008
Case No. C08-5326RBL/JKA (W.D. Wash. Jun. 25, 2008)
Case details for

Brown v. Schrum

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY TYREE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. DEVON SCHRUM et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Jun 25, 2008

Citations

Case No. C08-5326RBL/JKA (W.D. Wash. Jun. 25, 2008)