From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Rieger

United States District Court, D. Maine
Oct 7, 2022
2:22-cv-00259-JAW (D. Me. Oct. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00259-JAW

10-07-2022

SUZANNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY RIEGER, et al., Respondents.


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on September 22, 2022, his Recommended Decision. Report and Recommended Decision on Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 13). Ms. Brown did not file any objection. The Court reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, and the Court made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and the Court concurs with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision and determines that no further proceeding is necessary.

The Court AFFIRMS the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 13) and thereby DENIES Ms. Brown's requests for emergency injunctive relief. (ECF No. 4, ECF No. 8, ECF No. 11).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Rieger

United States District Court, D. Maine
Oct 7, 2022
2:22-cv-00259-JAW (D. Me. Oct. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Brown v. Rieger

Case Details

Full title:SUZANNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY RIEGER, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, D. Maine

Date published: Oct 7, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00259-JAW (D. Me. Oct. 7, 2022)