From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Richland Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 27, 2014
552 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-2224

01-27-2014

ORLANDO BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendant - Appellee.

Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Garfield, Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-03062-MBS) Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Garfield, Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Orlando Brown appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Richland Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, No. 3:12-cv-03062-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Brown v. Richland Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 27, 2014
552 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Brown v. Richland Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:ORLANDO BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 27, 2014

Citations

552 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Brown v. South Carolina

Further, to the extent that Plaintiff objects on the grounds that this judgment is not considered to be final…