Brown v. Renfroe

Full title: RAYMOND W. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. CARL RENFROE, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Brunswick Division

Date published: Mar 9, 2011

CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV210-003 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 9, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV210-003.

March 9, 2011

ORDER

LISA WOOD, Chief Judge

After an independent and de novo review of the record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which Objections have been filed. In his Objections, Plaintiff newly claims that the passage of the Georgia Sex Offender Act O.C.G.A. § 42-1-12 was illegal. Plaintiff seems to believe that, if the act was illegally created, Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) would not bar his claim. He is wrong. Plaintiff still seeks relief requiring the invalidation of his conviction, which is prohibited.

Plaintiff's Objections are without merit. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff's Objections are OVERRULED. Defendant Renfroe's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. The Clerk is authorized and directed to enter the appropriate Judgment.

SO ORDERED, this 8 day of March, 2011.