From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Rathman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 31, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cv-01470-RDP (N.D. Ala. Oct. 31, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-01470-RDP

10-31-2013

JEREMY A. BROWN, Petitioner, v. JOHN T. RATHMAN, Warden, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 8, 2013, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed by Petitioner or Respondent.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate Judge. The court further ACCEPTS the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied.

A separate order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered contemporaneously herewith.

__________________________

R. DAVID PROCTOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Rathman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 31, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cv-01470-RDP (N.D. Ala. Oct. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Brown v. Rathman

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY A. BROWN, Petitioner, v. JOHN T. RATHMAN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-01470-RDP (N.D. Ala. Oct. 31, 2013)

Citing Cases

Morales v. Jones

The Court is aware that some courts have excused the failure to provide a DHO report where the respondent…

Boyd v. Driver

As a preliminary matter, Boyd does not cite to any specific policy or procedure memorializing any…