From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Quentin

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 23, 2023
23-cv-00973-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-00973-HSG

06-23-2023

KENYON DARRELL BROWN, Petitioner, v. SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON WARDEN, et al., Respondents.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On or about March 3, 2023, Petitioner filed this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Dkt. No. 1. On May 2, 2023, the Court denied Petitioner's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis because his inmate statement report indicates that he has sufficient funds to pay the $5.00 filing fee. Dkt. No. 9. Petitioner was ordered to pay the $5.00 filing fee by May 31, 2023, or face dismissal of this action. Id. The deadline to pay the filing fee has passed, and Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise communicated with the Court. The Court therefore DISMISSES this action without prejudice. Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any such motion must be accompanied by the filing fee. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Respondent and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Quentin

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 23, 2023
23-cv-00973-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Brown v. Quentin

Case Details

Full title:KENYON DARRELL BROWN, Petitioner, v. SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON WARDEN, et…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 23, 2023

Citations

23-cv-00973-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2023)