From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Phiffer

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 25, 2023
23-cv-03583-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-03583-JD

09-25-2023

BRUCE BROWN, Petitioner, v. PHIFFER, Respondent.


ORDER RE DISMISSAL RE: DKT. NOS. 2, 6

JAMES DONATO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed a pro se habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Court records indicate that petitioner filed a petition raising similar claims challenging the same conviction that was denied as untimely. See Brown v. District Attorney, Case No. 22-cv-5609 JD. This case is dismissed as duplicative. See Adams v. Cal. Dept. of Health Services, 487 F.3d 684, 688 (9th Cir. 2007). To the extent petitioner seeks to file a new petition about resentencing that would not be a successive petition, he must first exhaust that claim in state court.

The case is dismissed without prejudice as duplicative. The pending motions (Dkt. Nos. 2, 6) are vacated. No fee is due. A certificate of appealability is denied and the Clerk is requested to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Phiffer

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 25, 2023
23-cv-03583-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Brown v. Phiffer

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE BROWN, Petitioner, v. PHIFFER, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 25, 2023

Citations

23-cv-03583-JD (N.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2023)