From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Perrine

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 21, 2003
855 So. 2d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 1D02-4940

Opinion filed August 21, 2003. Rehearing Denied October 1, 2003.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. L. Ralph Smith, Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

Donna La Plante, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee; Louis A. Vargas, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Having considered the appellant's responses to this Court's orders of May 23, 2003, and June 16, 2003, as well as the appellee's reply filed on June 6, 2003, the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely. See Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530(b). The appellant brought an original petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the appellee, in his official capacity, to perform a legal duty. Because the petition did not seek review of agency action, the civil rules of procedure, rather than the appellate rules of procedure were controlling. Cf. Newell v. Moore, 826 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Under these rules, the appellant's motion for rehearing was not timely, therefore, it did not delay rendition of the order on appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.020(h). All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, PADOVANO and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED


Summaries of

Brown v. Perrine

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 21, 2003
855 So. 2d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Brown v. Perrine

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. BROWN, Appellant, v. WARDEN JOHN DOE PERRINE, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 21, 2003

Citations

855 So. 2d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)