From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Neopost USA, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 10, 2012
NO. 3:12-1029 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 10, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3:12-1029

10-10-2012

RAVONDA BROWN v. NEOPOST USA, INC.


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01.

Pursuant to Local Rule 16.01(e)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d), discovery is not stayed absent order of the District Judge.

This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Judge in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01(d)(5).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Neopost USA, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 10, 2012
NO. 3:12-1029 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Brown v. Neopost USA, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RAVONDA BROWN v. NEOPOST USA, INC.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 10, 2012

Citations

NO. 3:12-1029 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 10, 2012)