From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Mayfield

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit
Oct 31, 1952
61 So. 2d 248 (La. Ct. App. 1952)

Opinion

No. 7840.

October 31, 1952.

APPEAL FROM SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CLAIBORNE PARISH, H. W. AYRES, J.

Meadors, Shaw Meadors, Homer, for appellant.

Blanchard, Goldstein, Walker O'Quin, Shreveport, for appellee.


This is a suit for a declaratory judgment in favor decreeing them to be the owners of 1/4 interest in the oil, gas and other minerals underlying certain lands in the Haynesville field in Claiborne Parish.

Judgment was rendered and signed in the district court in favor of plaintiffs.

Defendant appeals suspensively and devolutively to this court.

The record is bare of any proof of the value of the mineral interest in contest. In the minutes of court is incorporated the following stipulation: "It is stipulated by counsel for both plaintiffs and defendant that the property involved in this suit is worth more than $100.00 but less than $2,000.00."

Our appreciation of the law is that jurisdiction for purposes of appeal cannot be conferred by agreement of the parties. Martin v. Carroll, 220 La. 481, 56 So.2d 843; Tucker v. Woodside, 218 La. 708, 50 So.2d 814 and cases cited.

For these reasons this cause is remanded to the district court for the purpose of taking evidence as to the value of the mineral interest in contest. Costs of this appeal to be equally divided between plaintiffs and defendant, taxing other costs to await final determination of the controversy.


Summaries of

Brown v. Mayfield

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit
Oct 31, 1952
61 So. 2d 248 (La. Ct. App. 1952)
Case details for

Brown v. Mayfield

Case Details

Full title:BROWN et al. v. MAYFIELD

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit

Date published: Oct 31, 1952

Citations

61 So. 2d 248 (La. Ct. App. 1952)

Citing Cases

Laborde v. Mayeux

This court, following the well established rule of the Supreme Court, has many times held that appellate…

Ilardo v. Agurs

The record contains no evidence fixing any value of the matter in contest, and for this reason this cause…