From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 28, 2019
262 So. 3d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D18-5230

01-28-2019

Curtis BROWN, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary Fla. Dept. of Corr., Respondent.

Curtis Brown, pro se, Petitioner. Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Curtis Brown, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 28, 2019
262 So. 3d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Brown v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS BROWN, Petitioner, v. MARK S. INCH, Secretary Fla. Dept. of Corr.…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jan 28, 2019

Citations

262 So. 3d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)