From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 2, 2015
1:12-cv-01472-LJO-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2015)

Opinion

1:12-cv-01472-LJO-GSA-PC

06-02-2015

CORNELL BROWN, Plaintiff, v. R. HARRIS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
(Doc. 62.)

On November 19, 2014, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 62.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff must file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment of November 19, 2014; and

2. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to obey the court's order and failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 2 , 2015

/s/ Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 2, 2015
1:12-cv-01472-LJO-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Brown v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:CORNELL BROWN, Plaintiff, v. R. HARRIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 2, 2015

Citations

1:12-cv-01472-LJO-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2015)