From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Graham

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 31, 2011
9:07-CV-1353 (FJS/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2011)

Opinion

9:07-CV-1353 (FJS/ATB).

March 31, 2011

GENEO BROWN, 97-A-0463, Great Meadows Correctional Facility, Comstock, New York, Plaintiff pro se.

CHRISTINA L. ROBERTS-RYBA, AAG, OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Albany, New York, Attorneys for Defendants.


ORDER


In a Report and Recommendation dated March 30, 2010, Magistrate Judge Baxter recommended that the Court (1) deny Defendants Brown and McCarthy's motion for judgment on the pleadings as moot; (2) deny Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment; and (3) grant Defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment and dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety. See Dkt. No. 90. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, essentially raising the same arguments that he presented to Magistrate Judge Baxter. See Dkt. No. 99.

When a party files specific objections to a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the district court makes a " de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, when a party files "[g]eneral or conclusory objections or objections which merely recite the same arguments [that he presented] to the magistrate judge," the court reviews those recommendations for clear error. O'Diah v. Mawhir, No. 9:08-CV-322, 2011 WL 933846, *1 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2011) (citations and footnote omitted). After the appropriate review, "the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Despite the conclusory nature of most of Plaintiff's objections, the Court has reviewed the record de novo in light of the issues that Plaintiff raised in those objections. Having completed that review, the Court finds his objections to be without merit.

Accordingly, the Court hereby

ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Baxter's March 30, 2010 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants Brown and McCarthy's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED as moot; and the Court further

ORDERS that Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and the Court further

ORDERS that Defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiffs amended complaint is DISMISSED; and the Court further

ORDERS the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants and close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Graham

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 31, 2011
9:07-CV-1353 (FJS/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Brown v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:GENEO BROWN, Plaintiff, v. H.D. GRAHAM, Supt., Auburn Correctional…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Mar 31, 2011

Citations

9:07-CV-1353 (FJS/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2011)

Citing Cases

Birdo v. Gomez

ected by the First Amendment if it was intended to convey a particularized message," Stefanoff v. Hays…

Gandhi v. N.Y. State Unified Court Sys.

To support the assertion that mere circumstantial evidence of causation is insufficient, Defendant cites…