From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. First State Bank

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Nov 5, 2019
No. 05-19-00865-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2019)

Opinion

No. 05-19-00865-CV

11-05-2019

THOMAS G. BROWN D/B/A/ B & B CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant v. FIRST STATE BANK OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 56631

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Pedersen, III, Reichek, and Carlyle
Opinion by Justice Carlyle

We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal from the trial court's July 9, 2019 summary judgment because it appeared the judgment was not final. An appeal may only be taken from judgment disposing of all parties and claims, subject to mostly statutory exceptions. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The judgment here finally disposed of appellant's claims against appellee but did not dispose of appellant's claims against a third party.

At our request, the parties filed letter briefs addressing our jurisdiction. Appellant's letter directs the majority of its focus at federal criminal statutes as the basis for our jurisdiction. We are not a federal court. We, and the district court below, are courts of the state of Texas. Federal statutes do not establish our jurisdiction.

Appellant fails to even cite to appropriate federal jurisdictional statutes. It appears the gist of appellant's argument is that this court has jurisdiction to decide appeals in cases including causes of action based on federal statutes. This is what is called "federal question" jurisdiction, the authority for which resides in 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and it is the basis for jurisdiction in federal, not state, district court. And federal appeals courts' jurisdiction over final decisions of federal district courts is described by 28 U.S.C. § 1291. But these statutes do not define our jurisdiction as a state court. Appellant's letter response to our jurisdictional question identifies no basis for this court to exercise jurisdiction in this case at this time.

Because this appeal is not from a final judgment disposing of all claims against all parties, and because there is no order severing the claims appellant purports to appeal from those that remain, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

We also deny appellant's motion to consolidate this appeal into a previously dismissed appeal.

/Cory L. Carlyle/

CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE 190865F.P05

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court, Kaufman County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 56631.
Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. Justices Pedersen, III and Reichek participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee First State Bank of Texas recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Thomas G. Brown d/b/a B & B Construction Company. Judgment entered this 5th day of November, 2019.


Summaries of

Brown v. First State Bank

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Nov 5, 2019
No. 05-19-00865-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2019)
Case details for

Brown v. First State Bank

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS G. BROWN D/B/A/ B & B CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant v. FIRST…

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Nov 5, 2019

Citations

No. 05-19-00865-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2019)