Summary
In Brown v. Davita, 09-2892, 2011 WL 5523823 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 2011), the plaintiff admitted that she knew of the statements and who spoke them by a certain time, but claimed that she was unaware that she had a cause of action against the speaker until after she retained an attorney.
Summary of this case from Weinik v. Temple Univ. of Commonwealth Sys. of Higher Educ.Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3892
11-14-2011
JENNIFER BROWN, Plaintiff, v. DAVITA INC., CHRISTOPHER PAUL, LINDA GAETO AND JILL TORTUAL, Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2011, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiff's Defamation Claim (Document No. 44, filed October 6, 2011), Plaintiff Jennifer Brown's Reply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Document No. 45, filed October 24, 2011), and Defendants' Reply in Support of their Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Document No. 46, filed October 25, 2011), IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiff's Defamation Claim is GRANTED.
BY THE COURT:
Hon. Jan E. DuBois
JAN E. DUBOIS, J.