From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 3, 1987
129 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

April 3, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Denman, Pine and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Interrogatory No. 9, in part, asks plaintiffs to state what language is deemed to have been inadequate in the warnings concerning the air rifle. This is a proper request and should be answered.

The answers to interrogatories Nos. 5 and 6 are inadequate.


Summaries of

Brown v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 3, 1987
129 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Brown v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM G. BROWN et al., as Parents and Natural Guardians of JEFFREY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1987

Citations

129 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Dijkstra v. Millar Elevator Industries, Inc.

Otherwise, it should answer the interrogatories as written. With respect to interrogatory 8 (c), which…